Executive Compensation Consulting Firms: 20 Advisers Compared

Published Updated 19 min read
Executive pay is a decision a board has to explain. A listed company's compensation committee sets the CEO's package and explains it to shareholders in the proxy statement. A private or nonprofit board has a smaller audience, but it still needs pay that keeps its leaders, rewards the right results and holds up when an investor, auditor or regulator asks how it was set.
An executive compensation consultant helps with that work. It benchmarks pay against comparable companies, designs annual and long-term incentives, prepares the committee for disclosure and shareholder questions, and advises on pay when a company goes public, merges or changes CEO.
This guide compares 20 firms that offer that advice. It groups them by business model and the clients their services are designed for, shows what each publishes as evidence, and explains the independence questions a committee should settle before it hires one.
DisclosureJake Jorgovan co-founded Alpha Apex Group, which is mentioned in this article.
Compare executive compensation consultants
The firms fall into three groups. The first are firms that describe executive and board pay as their main work. The second are pay practices inside larger firms that also sell insurance, benefits, organizational consulting, data or audit and tax services. The third brings together advisers whose services suit private companies, family businesses, public-sector bodies and nonprofits. Some firms in every group work across these lines.
The list is not ranked, and other firms also advise on executive pay. No executive pay fee was found on the pages checked for these 20.
| Firm | Who it says it advises | Strongest published proof | Ownership or wider business |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firms focused on executive and board pay8 of 20 firms | |||
| Compensation Advisory Partners | Boards and management, from Fortune 100 companies to start-ups; private and tax-exempt organizations | None published beyond its research and media quotes | Independent firm founded in 2009 |
| ClearBridge Compensation Group | Boards and management of public and private companies, from early-stage firms to the Fortune 500 | Names 16 clients, including Merck, Foot Locker and Take-Two Interactive | Independent firm |
| Compensia | Compensation committees of technology and life sciences companies | None published; says it partners with more Russell 3000 companies in those sectors than any other adviser | Independent firm |
| FW Cook | Public and private companies, on pay for executives, key employees and directors | An anonymized failed say-on-pay case reports over 90% support the following year; also a CEO recruitment-package case | Independent firm; affiliated with FIT Remuneration in the UK |
| Meridian Compensation Partners | Compensation committees and management | Coeur Mining's 2026 proxy names it as the committee's consultant for 2025; more than 800 client relationships | Independent firm |
| Pay Governance | Compensation committees and management of S&P 500, Russell 3000 and private companies | None published beyond its client range | Independent firm founded in 2010 |
| Pearl Meyer | Compensation committees and CEOs | Meritage Homes' 2026 proxy says its committee has engaged Pearl Meyer since 2018 | Also runs leadership consulting and salary surveys |
| Semler Brossy | Boards and management teams | Anonymized cases, including a company that passed its next say-on-pay vote after a failed one | Also advises on talent and board stewardship |
| Executive pay practices inside larger firms6 of 20 firms | |||
| Deloitte | UK practice: remuneration committees of FTSE, AIM, private, PE-backed and pre-IPO companies | None published; annual FTSE pay guides | Part of Deloitte's audit, consulting, risk and tax network |
| Gallagher | Public, private and nonprofit organizations | None published | Insurance, risk management, and consulting firm. |
| ISS-Corporate | Public companies, through a data platform and advisers | Anonymized biotechnology case: an equity plan passed on resubmission after its modeling | Subsidiary of Institutional Shareholder Services, the proxy adviser |
| Korn Ferry | Boards and executive teams | None published | Organizational consulting firm that draws on executive placement data |
| Mercer | Boards and management | None published; its practice lists 50+ executive rewards partners and principals in the US | Being renamed Marsh; also risk, insurance, benefits, retirement and investments |
| NFP Compensation Consulting | Public, private and nonprofit boards and executives | Anonymized cases, including a phantom stock plan for a community bank holding company | Part of NFP, an Aon company |
| Private, family-owned, public-sector and nonprofit organizations6 of 20 firms | |||
| Astron Solutions | Nonprofits, healthcare and mid-sized organizations | Named testimonials, including Calvary Hospital's CEO on its executive incentive plan | HR consulting and software firm |
| JER HR Group | Boards and HR leaders at nonprofit, private and public organizations | Named testimonial from the U.S. Fund for UNICEF on executive pay | HR consulting firm |
| Lions Financial | Business owners, executives and private equity firms | None published | Financing, insurance and benefits firm |
| The POE Group | Smaller public companies, private and family-owned businesses | Undated board-member testimonials from Itafos, Meritage Homes and Coeur Mining; Meritage's and Coeur's 2026 proxies name Pearl Meyer and Meridian | A brand of RedRock Compensation Consulting |
| Richardson Compensation Consulting | Public-sector, nonprofit and business organizations | None published | Broad-based compensation consulting firm |
| VisionLink | Private growth companies | Named testimonials, including Dupré Logistics' CEO on a long-term incentive plan | Also sells self-serve incentive plan software |
Firms focused on executive and board pay
8 of 20 firmsThese firms describe executive and director pay, and the governance around it, as their main work, and all but Pearl Meyer describe their advice as independent on the pages read. Most of their published material is written for public-company compensation committees, and several also advise private companies.
Compensation Advisory Partners
Back to the comparisonCompensation Advisory Partners website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A public-company committee that wants a firm set up to give independent executive pay advice
- Founded
- 2009
Compensation Advisory Partners (CAP) describes itself as an independent firm specializing in executive and director compensation and related governance. Its partners set it up in 2009, its about page says, to provide "strictly independent executive compensation consulting advice", and its client experience runs from Fortune 100 companies to start-ups.
The services page (opens in a new tab) covers committee support, pay strategy, benchmarking, incentive design, disclosure and shareholder outreach, director pay, CEO transitions, IPOs and spin-offs. CAP also keeps a database of private-company director pay built with the publisher of Directors & Boards. Its homepage shows 2026 research on regional bank pay and partners quoted in Fortune and Agenda.
ClearBridge Compensation Group
Back to the comparisonClearBridge Compensation Group website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A public or private company that wants to see named clients before the first call
- Evidence
- 16 named clients on its Our Work page (opens in a new tab)
ClearBridge publishes a sample of its client experience: ADT, BBVA, Clear Secure, Foot Locker, GameStop, J. Crew, Merck, Outfront Media, Paramount Global, PVH Corp., Scotts Miracle-Gro, Take-Two Interactive, The Hain Celestial Group, Time Warner Cable, Tradeweb Markets and WD-40 Company. The page gives no dates for that work. It says the firm has advised companies in all 24 sub-industry groups within 11 major sectors.
It calls itself an independent firm advising boards and senior management. Its most requested services are total compensation reviews, annual and long-term incentive design, performance measurement and board pay, and it lists M&A, IPOs, de-SPACs and turnarounds among its special situations.
Compensia
Back to the comparisonCompensia website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- The compensation committee of a technology or life sciences company
Compensia describes itself as the leading independent adviser to the compensation and human capital committees of technology and life sciences companies, and says it partners with more Russell 3000 companies in those two sectors than any other adviser. It does not explain how that count is made, and it names no clients on the pages read.
Its services page (opens in a new tab) covers long-term incentives, pay and performance alignment, IPOs, M&A and turnarounds, say-on-pay and equity plan engagement with shareholders, shareholder proposals, severance, change in control and executive succession. The homepage cites more than 850 years of collective experience and publishes regular alerts on disclosure rules and proxy advisers.
FW Cook
Back to the comparison- Potential fit
- A committee facing a say-on-pay problem, an IPO or a CEO transition
- Where it works
- seven US offices, with a formal affiliation with FIT Remuneration in the UK
- Evidence
- anonymized engagement summaries on its services page (opens in a new tab)
FW Cook's services page, published in June 2025, describes anonymized engagements without dates. After a failed say-on-pay vote, it helped a company with shareholder outreach and refined the pay programs, and the company "received over 90% shareholder support in following year". In another, it worked with a board's search committee on the pay of several CEO candidates, including any make-whole amounts, and drafted the term sheet the committee used to negotiate with its chosen candidate.
Its market leader page (opens in a new tab) says it has "the #1 market share among the S&P 500, S&P 1500, and Russell 3000" and that over a quarter of S&P 500 companies can attest to its approach. It does not say how the share is counted.
The firm says it has given independent executive compensation advice for over half a century to public and private companies, covering executives, key employees and non-employee directors. It keeps a proxy database for the S&P 1500 and its own survey of the top 20 highest-paid executives at over 400 companies. Three short testimonials on the page are unattributed.
Meridian Compensation Partners
Back to the comparisonMeridian Compensation Partners website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A compensation committee that wants a large independent firm with in-house technical teams
- Where it works
- consultants in Lake Forest, Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Detroit, Houston, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Toronto (its team page)
- Evidence
- Coeur Mining's 2026 proxy statement (opens in a new tab)
Coeur Mining's 2026 proxy statement says its compensation committee retained Meridian for the 2025 compensation year and, after weighing the independence factors, found it independent. Meridian itself says its consultants share insights from "more than 800 client relationships", and its services page refers to experience with thousands of clients in program design. Its site describes it as one of the largest independent executive compensation consulting firms.
The services page (opens in a new tab) covers board advisory work, benchmarking for executive and director pay, transactions, performance alignment, program design, and the regulatory, tax and accounting issues behind pay, including proxy adviser strategy and severance and change-in-control calculations. Board advisory work includes helping set the committee's calendar and agenda and representing the committee's view in discussions with management.
Pay Governance
Back to the comparisonPay Governance website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A committee that wants an adviser whose stated philosophy is to work for the committee, alongside management
- Founded
- 2010
Pay Governance says its 25 partners and nearly 80 professionals advise S&P 500 and Russell 3000 companies as well as private organizations, from start-ups to Fortune 100 companies. It was founded in 2010, and its about page (opens in a new tab) states its philosophy: "Hired by the Compensation Committee, to work with management on behalf of the Committee and shareholders."
Its services cover committee advisory work, incentive design, accounting, tax and SEC updates, governance, and pay in M&A, IPOs, spin-offs, financings, private equity deals and transitions. Its homepage publishes research, including a 2026 say-on-pay recap.
Pearl Meyer
Back to the comparisonPearl Meyer website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A board that wants executive pay advice joined to succession and leadership work
- Evidence
- Meritage Homes' 2026 proxy statement (opens in a new tab)
Meritage Homes' 2026 proxy statement says that "since 2018, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pearl Meyer" as its independent executive compensation consultant, advising on pay for its named executives and board. No clients are named on Pearl Meyer's pages read for this guide.
The firm pairs executive compensation with leadership consulting, including executive succession and board effectiveness, and runs its own salary surveys. Its executive compensation page (opens in a new tab) covers incentive design, pay modeling, employment contracts, severance and change-in-control agreements, and investor policy reviews, and links an October 2025 survey of 248 companies on executive pay practices for 2026. The about page says the firm has worked in the field for more than 30 years and has been a strategic content partner of the National Association of Corporate Directors for almost 25 years.
Semler Brossy
Back to the comparison- Potential fit
- A company with a failed say-on-pay vote, a transaction or a transformation to reflect in pay
- Where it works
- affiliated with Hugessen Consulting in Canada and Ellason in the UK (its about page)
- Evidence
- say-on-pay case study (opens in a new tab)
Semler Brossy publishes anonymized case studies. In one, posted in January 2024, a direct-to-consumer company's say-on-pay vote had failed over how the board used discretion on bonuses. Semler Brossy ranked the possible fixes, prepared the committee chair for shareholder outreach and helped change goal setting, and the company "successfully passed its next 'Say on Pay' vote". Its case index (opens in a new tab) lists others, including pay strategy for a large-scale transformation.
Its work covers annual pay advice, special situations such as IPOs, turnarounds, bankruptcy and executive transitions, board stewardship and support for human capital committees. It publishes say-on-pay reports and a CEO succession report prepared with The Conference Board and Egon Zehnder.
Executive pay practices inside larger firms
6 of 20 firmsThese practices sit inside firms that also sell other services: insurance, benefits, retirement, organizational consulting, proxy data or audit and tax. That can mean broader data and one relationship for several needs. For a company covered by Rule 10C-1 it also means the committee must weigh those other services when it assesses the adviser's independence.
Deloitte
Back to the comparisonDeloitte website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A UK-listed, AIM, private equity-backed or pre-IPO company
- Where it works
- the UK practice; ask which member firm would serve a company elsewhere
Deloitte's UK executive remuneration practice advises remuneration committees and management at FTSE, AIM, private, private equity-backed, financial services and pre- and post-IPO companies. Its team includes remuneration, share plan, tax and accounting specialists, actuaries and lawyers. It publishes guides to directors' pay in FTSE 100, FTSE 250, SmallCap and AIM 100 companies.
Gallagher
Back to the comparisonGallagher website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A private, family-owned or nonprofit organization, or a public company that wants one firm for benefits and pay
- Evidence
- executive compensation consulting page (opens in a new tab)
Gallagher, an insurance, risk management and consulting firm, runs an executive compensation consulting practice whose consultants, it says, have more than 30 years of experience. Its page lists separate services for public companies (committee advice, executive and director benchmarking, incentive design, equity dilution analysis, ISS reviews and IPOs), private companies (family-owned pay, succession and wealth transfer) and nonprofits (reasonableness opinions and 457 plans).
ISS-Corporate
Back to the comparisonISS-Corporate website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A public company that wants peer data and modeling it can run itself
- Ownership
- a wholly owned subsidiary of Institutional Shareholder Services (its legal page)
- Evidence
- an anonymized case study (opens in a new tab)
ISS-Corporate's case study describes a biotechnology company listed on NASDAQ and in Europe whose equity plan failed to win shareholder support. Its advisers modeled alternative designs, the company resubmitted the plan with shareholder-friendly changes, and the plan passed. The document carries a 2025 copyright and no engagement date.
The firm offers a data platform with advisers for designing and monitoring executive pay. Its page describes peer benchmarking from a large database of company-disclosed peers, what-if analyses and pay-for-performance checks, and invites companies to request a demonstration. Its legal page (opens in a new tab) says it is wholly owned by Institutional Shareholder Services, the proxy adviser. ISS is one of the proxy advisers whose policies other firms on this list help clients plan for, so a committee should weigh that relationship. The case study says the ISS STOXX governance and ESG research teams are separate from ISS-Corporate and will not give its clients preferential treatment.
Korn Ferry
Back to the comparisonKorn Ferry website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A company that wants pay advice from a firm that also works on leadership and organization design
Korn Ferry starts its executive compensation page with pay philosophy. The page also covers benchmarking that draws on global pay and executive placement data, the design of salary, incentives and contracts, governance and tax implications, and explaining the plan to executives and the board. The firm describes itself as an organizational consultancy. If the firm also recruits your executives, ask how that work is kept apart from pay advice to the committee.
Mercer
Back to the comparisonMercer website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A large or global company that wants broad pay data alongside the advice
Mercer's homepage says "Mercer is becoming Marsh", and its executive compensation page already presents the practice under the Marsh name. That page lists 50+ executive rewards partners and principals in the US, 50+ outside it and 75+ years of advising boards and management, figures it says reflect Marsh's global practice. Its public-filings database covers about 3,500 companies and about 18,000 executives a year (figures as of September 1, 2026). Under the Marsh name the site also covers risk and insurance, benefits, retirement and investments. The page says the practice keeps formal conflict-of-interest policies for its advice to boards and management.
NFP Compensation Consulting
Back to the comparisonNFP Compensation Consulting website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A private, PE-backed or nonprofit organization, or a company in restructuring
- Evidence
- anonymized case studies (opens in a new tab)
NFP Compensation Consulting's case studies describe anonymized engagements. For a holding company of privately held community banks, the compensation committee asked it to replace a phantom stock plan that participants did not understand. For private equity-backed companies planning to go public, it designed long-term incentive plans for after the IPO. For a nonprofit, it reviewed the CEO's deferred compensation plan for compliance with section 409A. The case pages carry no dates.
Its executive compensation page (opens in a new tab) covers CEO and executive plans, deferred compensation, supplemental retirement plans and pay through bankruptcy. Its footer describes NFP as an Aon company.
Private, family-owned, public-sector and nonprofit organizations
6 of 20 firmsThis group includes options for family businesses, private growth companies, hospitals, nonprofits and public bodies, organizations without a public shareholder vote. Several also advise public companies, and most offer broader compensation work as well.
Astron Solutions
Back to the comparisonAstron Solutions website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A nonprofit or hospital board setting executive pay it must report on Form 990
- Evidence
- named testimonials (opens in a new tab)
Astron publishes named testimonials. Frank A. Calamari, president and CEO of Calvary Hospital in the Bronx, says Astron gives the hospital's board and management assurance that "the executive incentive plan is in conformance with the Hospital's strategic plan". Emma Devito, president and CEO of Village Care in New York, credits its work on "our executive & staff base and incentive compensation systems". The testimonials page was published in July 2025; the quotes carry no dates of their own.
Its executive compensation page (opens in a new tab) gives particular attention to nonprofits and explains board approval and Form 990 reporting. Astron says it has offered compensation consulting for over 25 years and describes its fees as "affordably priced (with no hidden costs)", without a figure.
JER HR Group
Back to the comparisonJER HR Group website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A nonprofit board that needs CEO pay it can defend to donors and auditors
- Evidence
- testimonial from the U.S. Fund for UNICEF (opens in a new tab)
William Sherwood, vice president of human resources and administration at the U.S. Fund for UNICEF, says the organization "has benefited tremendously by consultation from JER HR Group on executive compensation issues over the past several years". The testimonial is undated.
JER's executive compensation page (opens in a new tab) serves boards and HR leaders at nonprofit, private and public organizations: benchmarking, salary and incentive design, deferred compensation under section 409A, and documentation for board review. It says it is trusted by 500+ organizations, a figure for all its HR services.
Lions Financial
Back to the comparisonLions Financial website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- An owner-led or PE-backed company whose executive pay depends on insurance, deferred pay or retirement benefits
Lions Financial's executive compensation page (opens in a new tab) is aimed at business owners, executives and private equity firms, and says its plans emphasize "financial solutions, insurance, and retirement benefits". It describes a four-step process it calls SIRE. The firm's wider business covers financing, capital markets, valuation and employee benefits. No executive pay client or case appears on the pages read.
The POE Group
Back to the comparisonThe POE Group website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A smaller public company's board or a family-owned business
- Where it works
- based in Tampa, Florida
- Evidence
- named client testimonials (opens in a new tab)
The POE Group publishes undated testimonials from named board members. Ron Wilkinson, a board member of Itafos, says the work began in December 2019 with a pay program for a new CEO. Ray Oppel, compensation committee chairman of Meritage Homes, wrote that POE "became the executive compensation consultant to Meritage's board in 2013", and John Robinson of Coeur Mining's compensation committee wrote that POE had served that board for five years. Both describe past work: the companies' 2026 proxy statements name Pearl Meyer and Meridian as their consultants.
Its executive compensation page (opens in a new tab) covers peer groups, incentive design, say-on-pay testing, CD&A drafting, director pay and intermediate sanctions studies for nonprofits. POE is a brand of RedRock Compensation Consulting.
Richardson Compensation Consulting
Back to the comparisonRichardson Compensation Consulting website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A municipality, school system, healthcare provider or nonprofit reviewing pay for its senior leaders
Richardson's leadership compensation page (opens in a new tab) offers a review of pay for executives (AVP to SVP) and officers (CIO, COO, CHRO), either alone or within a full compensation study. The firm serves public-sector, nonprofit and business organizations and also designs broad-based pay structures.
VisionLink
Back to the comparisonVisionLink website, captured October 2026.
- Potential fit
- A private company that wants long-term incentives or phantom stock for its leaders without issuing equity
- Evidence
- client testimonials (opens in a new tab)
The chief executive of Dupré Logistics says VisionLink helped "engineer a long-term incentive plan that has empowered our company to reward and retain key talent while increasing shareholder value". The president and CEO of Specialty Restaurants Corporation and the chief people officer of Yakima Chief Hops describe similar plans. The testimonials are undated.
VisionLink designs incentive and phantom stock plans for private growth companies, through an advisory service or self-serve software. Its advisory page (opens in a new tab) lists executive benefits among its specialties. The homepage says 65% of its new clients come from referrals.
Independence: what a compensation committee must weigh
For a company listed in the US, the rule is specific. Under SEC Rule 10C-1 (opens in a new tab) and the exchange listing standards that apply it, the compensation committee may retain its own compensation consultant and is "directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight" of that adviser. Controlled companies and smaller reporting companies are exempt, and the exchanges may exempt others. A covered committee must consider these six factors, and any the exchange adds, before selecting an adviser:
- other services the adviser's firm provides to the company
- the fees the company pays that firm, as a share of the firm's total revenue
- the firm's policies to prevent conflicts of interest
- any business or personal relationship between the adviser and a committee member
- any company stock the adviser owns
- any business or personal relationship between the adviser or its firm and an executive officer
The rule does not bar an adviser from a firm that sells other services. It requires the committee to weigh them, which is why the second group above is separated. A private, nonprofit or exempt company is not bound by the rule, and a UK board works under its own governance code, but the same questions show whose interests an adviser serves.
A public company's choice is also visible. Regulation S-K Item 407(e)(3) (opens in a new tab) requires the proxy statement to identify the compensation consultants that helped set executive and director pay and to describe their assignment. The exclusions are narrow: a role limited to broad-based plans open to all salaried employees, or to information the consultant gives without advice that is either standard or customized on parameters it did not set. Where a consultant the committee engaged, or its affiliates, also provided other services worth more than $120,000 in the last fiscal year, the proxy discloses both fee totals. It must also disclose any conflict of interest a named consultant's work has raised and how it is being addressed. A similar rule covers a consultant hired by management when the committee has none. Reading a few comparable companies' proxies shows which advisers they use.
Choose an adviser you expect to keep
In 2023 I wrote about a question from Ray Dalio's Principles that I said I used whenever I brought on a business partner or made a large investment. In my words then: "If you make this decision today, do you think you will be happy 10 years from now?" I'd ask it of a pay adviser too. The firm with the lowest first-year quote matters less than the one whose judgment the committee will still trust after a failed vote or a disputed bonus.
What to settle before you hire an adviser
Decide who the client is
Under Rule 10C-1, a covered committee is responsible for appointing and overseeing its adviser. Write down in the engagement letter who may ask the adviser for work, who sees its reports and how it works with management.
Ask for evidence from engagements like yours
Sixteen of the 21 firms name no clients on their own pages read; for two of them, Meridian and Pearl Meyer, a client's proxy statement does. For a public-company reference, check that company's latest proxy statement for the adviser it names. Ask for two or three references from committees at a similar size, ownership and industry, and for an anonymized example of advice the firm gave that management did not want to hear.
Agree the scope and the fee in writing
No executive pay fee was found on the pages checked for these firms. Ask whether a quote covers a single study or recurring committee advice, how a retainer is set, what counts as extra work (a transaction, an IPO, a proxy fight) and how that work is priced.
- What other services does your firm, or any company that owns it, provide to us or our executives?
- What share of your firm's revenue would our fees represent?
- Who will attend our committee meetings, and who does the analysis behind them?
- Which comparable companies would you propose as our peer group, and why?
- When did you last advise a committee through a failed or close say-on-pay vote, and what changed afterward?
- How do you price work outside the annual cycle, such as a CEO transition or a transaction?
Sources and method
How this list was made
Candidates were the 20 firms this page has covered. For each, the homepage, the executive pay service page and selected client, case, testimonial and FAQ pages were read on October 6, 2026. A firm is listed where its own site presents executive or board pay advice as a service; 20 do. Figures and testimonials come from the firms themselves.
Rules
- SEC Rule 10C-1, 17 CFR 240.10C-1, Listing standards for compensation committees, read October 6, 2026
- Regulation S-K Item 407, 17 CFR 229.407, Proxy disclosure of compensation consultants, read October 7, 2026
Jake's record
- Master decision-making, November 2023
Sources checked October 6 and 7, 2026

Jake Jorgovan
Jake works with enterprise leaders on marketing strategy and executive talent. He co-founded Alpha Apex Group, founded Content Allies, owns Listen Network and is a partner in Fieldtrip, a group of marketing agencies. He founded Lead Cookie and later sold it.
Related guides
Executive Search Firms: 26 Options for Senior Hires
Executive search
Fractional CHRO Consulting Firms: How to Choose
Fractional & interim leadership
How to design a compensation strategy, step by step
Enterprise operations