The Benefits of Recruitment Process Outsourcing, and When RPO Fits

Published Updated 13 min read
When hiring outgrows your recruiting team, the usual fixes are more recruiters or more agency fees. Both have limits. Adding permanent recruiters raises your fixed costs, while agency fees grow with every role you fill.
Recruitment process outsourcing (RPO) is a third option: an outside provider takes over the design and running of all or part of your recruiting. This guide explains what RPO is and how it is priced, which benefits hold up in providers' own published results, what you give up, and how to tell whether it fits your hiring before you sign.
DisclosureJake Jorgovan co-founded Alpha Apex Group, which is mentioned in this article.
What recruitment process outsourcing is
The Recruitment Process Outsourcing Association (opens in a new tab) (RPOA), an industry association for RPO, defines RPO as a form of business process outsourcing in which an employer "transfers all or part of its recruitment processes to an external service provider". The provider may bring its own recruiters, technology and reporting, or take over yours. The RPOA's key distinction is that an RPO provider "assumes ownership of the design and management of the recruitment process" and responsibility for its results, which staffing companies and search firms do not.
That changes what you buy. A contingent agency is paid when it places a candidate, and a retained search firm is paid to run a dedicated search; both fees are usually based on the hire's pay. An RPO provider is paid to run a hiring program for an agreed period and is measured against the program's agreed outcomes.
| Question | Recruiting agency or search firm | RPO provider | Internal recruiting team |
|---|---|---|---|
| What you buy | Candidates for specific roles | A recruiting function or program, run to agreed measures | Your own recruiters and tools |
| How you pay | A placement fee or a search retainer, usually based on the hire's pay | A management fee, fees per hire, or both | Salaries, tools and advertising |
| Who owns the overall recruiting process | You | The provider, with you | You |
| Fits best | Occasional or senior one-off hires | Sustained or uneven volume across many roles | Steady, predictable hiring |
The main types of RPO engagement
Providers name their models differently. The RPOA's explainer, drawing on RPO consultant Kim Davis, describes four main types.
| Type | What the provider takes on | Set-up time the RPOA gives |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise (full lifecycle) | Hiring for all roles, business units and locations, replacing internal recruiting resources | Typically 8 to 12 weeks |
| Hybrid or selective | Specific jobs, units, locations or stages, alongside your recruiters | 4 to 8 weeks |
| Project or on-demand | A defined number of openings in one place and timeframe; sometimes used as a pilot | A "Quick Start" of two weeks |
| Contingent | Direct sourcing for temporary and contract workers | Not stated |
The menus of the providers read for this guide map onto these types. Cielo lists (opens in a new tab) enterprise, hybrid, project, modular and high-volume RPO. TrueBlue's annual report describes its PeopleScout brand's full-cycle RPO, project RPO and recruiter-on-demand services. LevelUP HCS says (opens in a new tab) in October 2026 that most of its programs take 3–6 weeks to implement, depending on complexity, in four phases: discovery, implementation, go-live and ongoing support.
The approach described in this article, shown as a visual guide.
Figure details
Four Core RPO Engagement Models Enterprise RPO: Full lifecycle, replaces internal resources Hybrid / Selective: Specific jobs/stages alongside internal team Project / On-demand: Defined openings/timeframe, pilot model Contingent RPO: Direct sourcing for temporary and contract workers
Once running, a full-cycle program covers the whole sequence. TrueBlue describes PeopleScout's full-cycle RPO as overseeing talent acquisition from candidate sourcing through onboarding. In a partial or project program, you agree which of those stages the provider takes and which stay with your team.
The benefits of RPO, and what each depends on
The RPOA also publishes research on RPO's benefits. In its 2022 RPO Value and Insights Study (opens in a new tab), produced with Lighthouse Research & Advisory, 96% of employers using an RPO provider experienced improved hiring metrics and 42% a reduced cost of hiring. These are outcomes reported by RPO users in a survey published by an industry association, and fewer than half reported a lower cost of hiring. They do not tell you what RPO will do for your company.
Providers' published cases are more specific. They are the providers' own accounts, mostly with the client unnamed, but they show where the benefits come from.
Recruiting capacity that follows hiring volume
A team built around permanent recruiters is hard to resize quickly. An RPO provider carries the recruiters, so capacity can rise for a launch, a relocation or a seasonal peak and fall afterwards. TrueBlue describes its PeopleScout programs as "highly scalable", giving clients support "as their hiring volumes fluctuate".
It is the same logic I applied to my own teams. In a 2025 interview (opens in a new tab) I described building a full-time core and an hourly flex team after two rounds of layoffs. The structure was designed so that a fall in revenue could be absorbed by reducing hourly work instead of laying people off. RPO applies the same idea to recruiting. Whether you get that flexibility depends on the contract: a large fixed management fee behaves much like an internal team.
Lower spend where RPO replaces agency fees
The clearest cost savings in the published cases come from replacing agency and search fees. Acara Solutions reports more than $150,000 in savings (opens in a new tab) for a $650-million healthcare services company that had relied on contingent search agencies for IT roles, comparing its pricing with a search agency's. LevelUP HCS reports that a healthcare client (opens in a new tab) whose work with it began as executive search and became a project RPO, with five recruiters and an engagement manager, saved 57% in additional recruiting fees by cutting agency spend.
Broader figures are harder to pin down. Cielo says "RPO typically delivers operational savings of 20%-30%", without stating how that is measured. Before you can judge any such claim, you need your own baseline. Cielo's guide to building the business case (opens in a new tab) points out that recruiting costs are often spread across several budgets, so add up agency fees, recruiter pay, advertising, technology and hiring managers' time before you compare proposals.
Faster hiring, especially at volume
Several of the published results are about speed. Quest Diagnostics' chief human resource officer, Cecilia McKenney, is quoted on Cielo's RPO page saying the partnership was "lowering our time-to-fill by 60%". Kinetix reports 201 external nursing hires (opens in a new tab) in 100 days in a single market, against a goal of 100. LevelUP HCS reports meeting a fintech and media client's goal (opens in a new tab) of 2,100 hires in 15 weeks across 36 states.
Speed depends on your side of the process as much as the provider's. In LevelUP's healthcare provider case, the provider was first given roles to fill without access to hiring managers; its fix included intake sessions with the department managers and access to them.
A consistent, measured process
An RPO program can run to written service levels and a fixed reporting rhythm. Sevenstep's case for a global healthcare client (opens in a new tab) lists "7 SLAs and 19 KPIs, including compliance, candidate care, requisition management, and innovation", with daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly reviews. Acara set a target of five offers a month for its IT program and reported pipeline volume, time-to-submit and interview-to-hire ratios through dashboards linked to the client's HR system. For a company hiring across many sites, this standardization can matter more than the speed.
Reach for hard-to-fill roles
Kinetix says (opens in a new tab) RPO gives employers in fields with skill gaps access to "passive and hard-to-reach candidates". LevelUP describes a Bay Area hospital network (opens in a new tab) where some specialist vacancies had stayed open for up to 400 days; its six-month program met the target of 100 hires almost two months early.
A better experience for candidates
The provider handles much of what candidates see, so a well-run program can make your hiring easier to go through. In Cielo's healthcare case (opens in a new tab), first published in 2018, new-hire satisfaction rose from 80% to 94% after the program added on-demand voice interviews and virtual career fairs. That is one provider's account, but it is a benefit beyond speed. Agree who approves job descriptions and candidate messages, when applicants should receive status updates, and how candidates' feedback is collected alongside your hiring measures.
What the published cases report
| Provider | Client and engagement | What the provider reports |
|---|---|---|
| Acara Solutions | A $650-million healthcare services company; IT hiring (published January 2025) | More than 20 IT hires, over $150,000 saved against a search agency's pricing, 50-day average time-to-fill |
| Cielo | A 47,000-employee healthcare company; an RPO partnership with a centralized recruiting model (2018, updated 2024) | More than 10,000 roles filled a year; a 27-day average time-to-fill, compared with SHRM's 2017 benchmark of 36 days; over 16,500 hours of hiring managers' time saved |
| Kinetix | A healthcare client; nurse hiring campaign in a single market (undated) | 201 nursing hires in 100 days; separately, Lee Health credits Kinetix with 397 positions filled from 2019 to 2023 |
| LevelUP HCS | A healthcare provider; executive search moved to project RPO (2024) | 57% saved in additional recruiting fees, with five recruiters and an engagement manager |
| Medacs Healthcare (opens in a new tab) | An NHS trust, quoted anonymously by its HR director (undated) | RPO helped the trust reduce its medical locum spend; no figure or period given |
| Omnes Group | Florence Healthcare's Belgrade development team (2020) | Eight tech professionals hired for a team that had 10 members when the work began |
| Sevenstep | A global healthcare company; enterprise RPO through the COVID-19 pandemic (undated) | 7 SLAs and 19 KPIs, with daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly reviews |
Where the cases describe how the program ran (Acara, LevelUP and Sevenstep), they describe defined targets and regular reviews; ask any provider how it will set and review yours. Most are healthcare clients, which reflects the pages these examples came from; between them, the same providers also publish cases in technology, financial services, retail and manufacturing.
How RPO is priced
Most of the provider pages reviewed for this guide do not list an RPO price. Several publish how they charge, which matters as much, because it decides who carries the risk when hiring volume changes. The RPOA's explainer says "There isn't a flat industry-based fee" and describes three models.
| Model | How you pay | Risk and flexibility, as the RPOA describes them |
|---|---|---|
| Management fee | A monthly or hourly fee covering the provider's staff, technology, sourcing and overhead | Easier to budget but difficult to scale; the provider takes less risk |
| Pay for performance | A fee when each requisition opens and another when it is filled | Easier to scale, with costs that follow hiring; the provider takes most of the risk |
| Hybrid | A management fee combined with the open and close fees | Less risk for the provider than pay for performance, and more scalable than a fixed fee |
Public RPO providers' annual reports describe the same structures. TrueBlue's (opens in a new tab) says PeopleScout's pricing "is typically composed of a fee for each hire and/or talent consulting fees", affected by geography, volume, job type, recruiting difficulty and scope. Star Equity Holdings (opens in a new tab), formerly Hudson Global, whose Hudson Talent Solutions business provides RPO, says its RPO prices "contain both fixed fee and variable usage-based consideration", the variable part tied to candidates accepting offers. Korn Ferry's (opens in a new tab) separates an implementation phase from the recruiting phase, which carries "both fixed and variable fees". Acara Solutions' RPO FAQ (opens in a new tab) says its pricing "can include hourly or monthly fees, as well as fees per hire". Ask whether a proposal also charges separately for setting the program up.
Omnes Group publishes monthly prices for a dedicated tech-recruitment subscription. In October 2026, its RPO page (opens in a new tab) lists an "RPO + Growth" plan at $10,000 a month and a "Pro" plan for high-volume hiring at $25,000 a month, each covering up to three roles, with a custom plan for larger needs. Prices like these are only comparable once you know how many roles and which stages each covers.
The approach described in this article, shown as a visual guide.
Figure details
RPO Pricing Models: Risk vs. Scalability Management fee: Monthly/hourly fee; easy to budget, provider takes less risk Pay for performance: Requisition open/fill fees; provider takes most risk Hybrid model: Management fee + open/close fees; balances risk and scale
What you give up
RPO has real costs beyond the fee. In the RPOA's 2023 study with Lighthouse, cost was the top reason employers gave for not using RPO, followed by fear of losing control. Both concerns are worth taking seriously.
- Control and visibility. The provider designs and runs the process, sometimes with your former recruiters on its staff. Without regular reporting and an internal owner, hiring managers can lose sight of what is happening.
- Time to value. Set-up takes weeks, and the same RPOA study found employers with a positive return were more likely to have had the relationship in place longer, "indicating that positive ROI isn't an overnight occurrence."
- Commitment. TrueBlue describes its PeopleScout programs as "generally multi-year", and Star Equity says it has negotiated three-to-five-year contracts with most of its key clients across its businesses. The same filing says its RPO clients "can terminate their relationship with us at any time with limited or no penalty". Terms vary, so read the termination clauses as closely as the price.
- Your employer brand and candidate data. The provider writes to candidates in your name and holds their records. Agree the brand rules, and check how the provider secures data and returns it at the end.
- Volume over fit. A provider measured on hires per month can send more candidates than your managers can assess. Define what a qualified candidate is, not only how many you need.
When RPO fits, and when it does not
RPO suits sustained or uneven hiring across many roles, where the program can run for long enough to pay back its set-up. Jim Bennett, vice president of human resources at Landis+Gyr, is quoted on Kinetix's RPO page recommending it to a company with "a lot of jobs to fill" quickly that does not want to "invest the time of doing so internally".
It can also be a bridge. Kirsty Leyland, chief human resources officer at Compassus, is quoted on the same page calling a year-long RPO project "a great interim solution" while she set a long-term strategy and grew her internal recruiting team.
RPO is likely to fit when:
- You are hiring in volume or in waves your team cannot absorb, such as a new site, an acquisition, a relocation or a seasonal peak
- You spend heavily on agency fees for roles you fill again and again
- Specialist roles stay open for months, or hiring practices differ across sites and need standardizing
It is less likely to fit when:
- You make a handful of hires a year, which an agency or your own team can handle
- You need a single senior appointment, where an executive search firm runs a dedicated search
- No one inside the company will own the relationship and the results
How to start an RPO program
The common mistakes with RPO, such as unclear expectations, poor communication and choosing on price alone, are easiest to avoid before the program starts.
Measure what recruiting costs you today
Add up agency and search fees, recruiter salaries, advertising, technology and the hours hiring managers spend. Note your current time-to-fill and how many hires you made. Without this baseline, no proposal's savings can be checked.
Decide what success means in a few numbers
Choose two or three measures that matter to the business, such as time-to-fill for priority roles, cost per hire and hiring managers' satisfaction with candidates. My rule is to be able to define success for the provider in one sentence before handing over the work.
Start with a defined project
A project RPO for one location, business unit or hiring wave tests the provider on real roles before a multi-year commitment. The RPOA describes project RPO as "sometimes used as a pilot", and LevelUP says many clients begin this way before expanding.
Write the service levels and the review rhythm into the contract
Agree the SLAs, the reports you will receive and how often you will review them. Sevenstep's healthcare program, with daily to quarterly checkpoints, is one example of how detailed this can be.
Name an internal owner and give the provider access to hiring managers
One person on your side owns the relationship and the results. Hiring managers need to brief the provider and respond quickly, or the program stalls.
Agree the exit before you sign
Set the notice period, what happens to your candidate data and pipeline, and how the program is handed back if you bring recruiting in-house. LevelUP, for example, says it supports a full handover with documentation, data transfer and training.
The approach described in this article, shown as a visual guide.
Figure details
Implementation Steps for Starting RPO Step 1: Baseline costs: Calculate search fees, salaries, ad spend, tech and TTF Step 2: Define metrics: Select 2-3 target metrics (e.g. priority role TTF, CPH) Step 3: Launch project: Pilot via project RPO in a single unit or location Step 4: Contract SLAs: Codify SLAs, KPIs and daily to quarterly review cycles Step 5: Own & exit terms: Designate internal owner; set exit, data, pipeline terms
Questions to ask an RPO provider
Ask every provider the same questions so their answers can be compared. For a list of providers, see the comparison of RPO companies; for scoring them, the guide to evaluating an RPO partner.
- Which pricing model do you propose, what does the set-up phase cost, and how does the price change if our hiring volume rises or falls?
- Which roles and seniority levels have you hired for in our industry, and can we speak to a client of a similar size?
- Will you draft a sourcing plan for one of our typical roles before we sign?
- Can you walk us through a program that missed its targets, what went wrong and what the contract covered?
- Which SLAs and reports do you propose, and how often will we review them together?
- Will you work in our applicant tracking system or bring your own, and who owns the candidate data?
- Who will run our program day to day, and how many other clients will they support?
- What are the notice and termination terms, and what do you hand back at the end?
Sources and method
How this list was made
The provider examples are the RPO firms cited by this page and the three pages merged into it, kept where the firm's own site describes an RPO service and publishes an RPO case or a client's account of a result. Pages were read on October 7, 2026; all case figures are the providers' own.
Research
- Recruitment Process Outsourcing Association: What is recruitment process outsourcing (RPO)?, updated February 2026
- TrueBlue: Form 10-K for fiscal 2025, PeopleScout RPO pricing
- Star Equity Holdings: Form 10-K for 2025, Hudson RPO pricing and contracts
- Korn Ferry: Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2026, RPO fee phases
Jake's record
- productize.co: Jake Jorgovan interview, May 2025, 27:29
Provider pages, annual reports and the RPO Association read October 7, 2026

Jake Jorgovan
Jake works with enterprise leaders on marketing strategy and executive talent. He co-founded Alpha Apex Group, founded Content Allies, owns Listen Network and is a partner in Fieldtrip, a group of marketing agencies. He founded Lead Cookie and later sold it.
Related guides
RPO Companies: 19 Recruitment Outsourcing Providers
Recruitment outsourcing
How to Evaluate an RPO Partner: Criteria, Terms and KPIs
Recruitment outsourcing
Recruitment metrics: what to track and how to measure them
Recruitment & workforce