10 Micro-Influencer Agencies and Platforms Compared

Curology reached 9x Amazon monthly sales through micro-influencer demand (opens in a new tab), according to Stack Influence. It also reports 35% lower cost per acquisition for AlterMe through micro-influencer whitelisting on Meta. The listing gives no baseline or measurement period for either figure. Those are distinct examples of marketplace sales and paid-ad performance.

Its micro-influencer promotions service (opens in a new tab) covers matching, posting briefs, product-based creator compensation and tracking. The same page says creators buy the product and are paid only once they post. The pricing page (opens in a new tab) advertises fully managed campaigns and an average fee of $30 per completed creator post, with $0 in monthly fees, in October 2026. The product's cost is not stated there. Ask for a total that includes the product allocation before comparing this with a cash-paid creator campaign.

ApexDrop publishes testimonials from Universal Standard, Russell Athletic and Foster Grant (opens in a new tab). These establish named client relationships; the page gives no client-specific result figure. Its success-stories page says results shown “are not typical and vary significantly,” and that “most clients see 1.5X-5X ROI; some see no positive return.” These are ApexDrop's own general claims, separate from the testimonials.

The firm describes its offer as managed product seeding with unpaid micro influencers. Its FAQ (opens in a new tab) puts the network at 3,000 to 50,000+ followers, averaging 10,000 per influencer per campaign on Instagram or TikTok. These figures describe the mix of creators in its network.

The FAQ also says creators are never required to post about products they do not like. Settle how the proposed scope handles products that generate no post. The Pricing page (opens in a new tab) read in October 2026 lists no prices; request the management charge, product and shipping costs, and expected deliverables together.

Cure Media's Philips OneUp seeding case (opens in a new tab) reports nearly a million in earned reach from 99 publications, a 64% publication rate, across Sweden, Norway and Finland. The case names no creator tier or campaign dates. Its case index (opens in a new tab) also lists work for Intersport, La Roche Posay and Kronans Apotek.

Its micro-influencer service explicitly places smaller creators within programs that also use mid-tier and macro accounts. Cure Media defines micro as 10,000 to 100,000 followers and describes selecting creators for content performance, audience quality and brand fit. Its broader service (opens in a new tab) covers strategy, creator and content approvals across markets, and measurement of paid and organic work.

This is a first-call option when the brief needs several creator tiers working together. Ask for the role and budget allocated to micro creators within that plan. No fee is published on the service and case pages read in October 2026.

inBeat reports a 45% increase in return on ad spend and 20% lower customer acquisition cost for Prose (opens in a new tab), attributing the work to a scalable micro-influencer creative program. The card gives no baseline or measurement period for these changes. The separate Prose case page (opens in a new tab) describes recruiting micro influencers to produce weekly assets but gives no result figures.

Its micro-influencer service covers discovery, negotiation, payments, agreements and strategy, plus paid amplification through creator accounts. Brands can approve or reject creators before collaboration. The page defines micro as 4,000 to 20,000 followers; the separate nano service (opens in a new tab) covers creators with 1,000 to 10,000 followers and addresses gifting, paid compensation, approvals and usage rights.

No fee is published on the micro, nano or case-index pages read in October 2026. For a first call, decide whether you need creators to reach their own audiences, produce assets for your ads, or both. Ask inBeat to scope those deliverables separately.

For Shoppers Drug Mart, PeersWay reports 6.1M total reach and 161k engagements (opens in a new tab) from a September 2020 campaign involving 150 influencers. The case does not name their follower tier. It is a dated example of delivery at scale for a firm whose service is built around nano creators.

The company offers managed campaigns in Canada, the US and the UK. Its four published plans (opens in a new tab) list Starter at $2,750 for five influencers, Basic at $5,250 for ten, Advanced at $10,000 for twenty and Premium at $22,500 for fifty in October 2026. The separate CAD and USD options display identical numbers.

Each influencer supplies one Reel and one Story. All plans include a campaign manager, influencer compensation and monthly reports. Content review, store visits, product giveaways and shipping are excluded. The page states no subscription, contract, setup or activation fee, and also offers product seeding as an alternative. Confirm the currency and content-review scope in your quote, especially if your brand needs approval before publication.

The Body Shop's Middle East campaign generated a 15% sales uplift and 30M impressions, according to Socially Powerful's influencer-marketing service page. The example does not identify the creators as micro or nano. Its nano campaign service (opens in a new tab) describes managing groups of 50, 100 or more creators, from vetting and briefing through approvals, payment and reporting.

The nano page read in October 2026 estimates four to eight weeks from strategy development to the final report. It puts campaign starting costs at $10,000 to $20,000, depending on creator volume, content complexity and duration. Its creator-payment figures conflict: one answer gives $50–$250 per paid post and another $20–$250. Have the firm resolve that difference in the proposed budget.

The main service page also says clients do not pay if the firm misses agreed KPIs. Beyond agreement on those KPIs, the service pages do not state the measurement period, exclusions or payment remedy mechanics. Put those terms in the agreement before treating the promise as financial protection.

In its homepage case for Bioderma, Starfish reports 220,000+ reach, 429,000+ views and 9.10% engagement. The case describes six female creators in the UAE, using both macro and micro accounts for skincare Reels and Stories. The figures cover that combined campaign; the micro contribution is not separated.

The firm positions itself as a micro-influencer marketing agency for the GCC, with offices in Dubai and Riyadh. Its services include creator selection, content distribution and analytics. That regional focus makes it a candidate when local creator fit is central to the brief. Request a proposed mix by country and follower band, using Bioderma as the starting example. No fee or numeric follower definition appears on the homepage read in October 2026.

InfluBase names HiPP Organic as a client in the Instagram feed embedded on its homepage, including a caption about the HiPP Twists campaign. The pages read contain no result figure for that work, so ask for the campaign's results on a first call.

The London firm defines micro as 1,000 to 50,000 Instagram followers. Its FAQ (opens in a new tab) offers discovery alone or discovery, campaign management and measurement together. It also says reach and engagement can be guaranteed upfront, without publishing conditions or a remedy. No fee is published on the homepage or FAQ read in October 2026. Also request a written definition of what the guarantee covers before choosing the service scope.

Collectively's Dove case (opens in a new tab) reports 1,047 creators across 44 campaigns in 2023, generating 1.9B impressions and 44.6M engagements. Those figures describe the whole program; the case does not name a follower tier.

Its specific micro credentials come from its own awards list (opens in a new tab): a 2023 Shorty Awards win for Best Micro Influencer Strategy for Dove US Influencer Community, and 2025 Global Influencer Marketing Awards gold for Most Effective Micro-Influencer Strategy for TRESemmé New York Fashion Week. Collectively lists these as awards; they do not establish independently verified campaign outcomes.

The firm offers ongoing creator partnerships, enterprise marketing strategy, creative and reporting. Ask it to show how a micro program would fit that broader relationship, with a comparable brief and a defined team. No fee is published on the homepage or work index read in October 2026.

Zorka reports “×4 lower CPA” for Krafton's PUBG work and a $25 average cost per thousand impressions for Scopely. Its service page and case index (opens in a new tab) present these as gaming results, without identifying them as micro-influencer outcomes.

The service covers mobile, PC and console games, from creator sourcing and briefs to contracts, usage rights, payments and measurement. Its creator-selection FAQ says micro and mid-tier creators frequently beat larger channels on cost per install. That is Zorka's own claim about its approach, not a benchmark for every gaming campaign. It says campaigns test a mix of tiers and expand the creators that meet the chosen KPI.

The page lists campaign tiers starting at $20K+, $50K+ and $150K+ in October 2026, with progressively broader strategy and creative work. Zorka calls these starting points. Request a proposal for the specific game, launch window and creator mix; they are not published micro-only packages.